Thursday, September 2, 2010

LCD vs Plasma

Well since this is a tech blog, I feel like I need to include other things here besides computers.  That being said, expect the majority of the posts on this blog to be focused on computers simply because that's where my passion lies.  But I've had a couple of friends requesting a post describing the difference between LCD and Plasma TVs and which one I suggested.  In addition, TVs make excellent PC displays if you have one available to use.

Samsung PN50C550 50-Inch 1080p Plasma HDTV (Black)Samsung UN46C6300 46-Inch 1080p 120 Hz LED HDTV (Black)

To answer the question of which I prefer, simply put, it would be neither.  I like them both.  Both Plasma and LCD TVs are great products being offered right now and now that production of both has increased so much, the prices on both have dropped drastically since they were first released.  To start with, let's take a look at how each TV actually works.

Plasmas displays are made up of a bunch of small "plasma" cells that are filled with different gases.  These cells are squished between two glass plates, given an electric charge, some magic (science way above my head involving photons and differing energy levels) happens and you have your picture.

LCDs are a very different technology.  In an LCD, liquid crystals are squished between two polarized panels, light is shone through the panels and crystals and BAM, you have your picture.  The light is usually generated by a cold cathode fluorescent lamp.  LED TVs that you see out now are actually LCD TV just with a different light source.  Changing from a fluorescent lamp to LEDs.

Instead of typing out my own thoughts on here, I'm going to refer you to an excellent article written by an excellent TV reviewer.  I pretty much agree with all of his thoughts, however, I think the quality between the two is even much closer than he thinks.  Follow the rabbit here.  Or here is the link to copy and paste:

http://www.lcdtvbuyingguide.com/lcdtv-plasmavslcd.shtml

To sum up what Phil says, both technologies have gotten much closer in the quality picture they offer.  However, Phil still gives the edge to plasma tvs.  Phil states the picture quality, contrast ratios, color accuracy, viewing angles, fast moving action, and value is all better with a plasma TV, especially with larger screen sizes.

My take on this is the average viewer will not be dissatisfied with either LCD or Plasma.  My advice, shop around, find the best deal, and get the best TV you can find for your budget.  You won't be disappointed with either and as time goes on, the quality of each is becoming closer and closer.

4 comments:

  1. But which one has a longer life expectancy? That's something I would take into consideration. The 60,000/100,000 hours can't be how long the actual units are expected to operate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 8766 hours in a year. I would expect a TV to last anywhere from 8-10 years. Not under warranty for that long but the actual unit should be able to last that long without breaking.

      Delete
  2. IMO, LCD and Plasma both offer attractive features of better quality resolution, advance color system, high image quality and great designs. Thanks for sharing this information.

    hire apple iPad developer

    ReplyDelete